Does a Variation Lead to One Claim or Three?

One of our distance students asked the question that if a variation causes additional work, a delay to the completion date and leads to entitlement to the payment of associated prolongation because all the entitlement stems from the variation costs, should one claim be submitted for the whole matter? This is a question that I have been asked on several occasions and I am afraid that I will have to give a lawyer’s answer and say that ‘it depends’.

If the variation causes additional work, delays the completion date and therefore entitles the contractor to prolongation costs, then it is strictly speaking one claim because all this stems from the variation.

If you think about the management of the claim from both a contractor’s and an engineer’s point of view however, in most cases I would advocate submitting separate claims as follows:

Evaluation of the additional work
The quantity surveyors/cost consultants can usually be relied upon to finalise this with few problems and the evaluation of the additional work may be quickly and easily settled at that level.

The extension of time
I prefer to submit a separate claim here because different people will usually deal with it on both sides. Planners or delay analysists need to establish the effect of the delay and contracts people need to establish the contractual entitlement and write a more complex narrative than would usually be necessary for the evaluation and entitlement to payment for the additional work.

Prolongation costs
Whether this is submitted separately to the extension of time claim really depends on the issue in question. If it is a large project and a long delay, I would probably submit separate claims. If the issue is less complicated, I would submit this with the extension of time claim.
The costs will flow from the extension of time, so if the engineer reduces the extension of time claim, then the costs will need to be reduced accordingly, meaning a revision to the claim if submitted with the extension of time claim.

On large projects, the site resources and the like that contribute to the prolongation costs may be numerous and both preparing and auditing the costs will be a time-consuming matter. The definition of prolongation costs also tends to be subjective and subject to interpretation, therefore this is also a more difficult and time-consuming matter to agree. Quite often the evaluation of the costs is undertaken by different people to those who deal with the extension of time and the evaluation of additional work.

Basically, if you submit everything under one claim, it could take a long time to resolve and this may hold up settlement of the easy issues while the more complex matters are resolved. Submitting three discrete claims will allow each matter to be settled in turn. Also, put yourself in the place of the person who will receive the claim. Would you prefer three small issues to deal with one-by-one, or one large complicated issue?

Subscribe to receive expert commentary on contracts and claims

If you have enjoyed this article and found it interesting, subscribe to our mailing list to receive more great technical articles, plus relevant industry news for the aspiring construction claims professional.

Like the article? Share this

Comments

Leave a comment 3 Reader Comments
  1. Written by
    Liaqat hayat on

    It is simple to understand clearly

  2. Written by
    Muhammad Kabir
    on

    I will prefer to deal in once as all thee components are interlinked each other and approval of one will impact to rest of submissions. However this not good to compile many issues in one claim. We should deal the issue from his initial stage without waiting several issues to claim.

  3. Written by
    Stefan Cavalli
    on

    There is actually potentially a fourth head of claim that could be advanced and that is the potential increase of value or work related prelims due to the additional work. For example a variation for additional external blockwork may require additional scaffolding which is generally included in the prelims and should be priced in accordance with rates and prices from this section of the BOQ. However, care would have to be taken not to double count by evaluation of the same item which has been evaluated in the prolongation as some items and are work related and time-related. (Scaffolding being the prefect example).

Leave a comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

required

optional